<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>İç Mimarlık Bölümü</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/27" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle>İç Mimarlık yayınlarını  içerir.</subtitle>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/27</id>
<updated>2025-10-16T16:33:55Z</updated>
<dc:date>2025-10-16T16:33:55Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Investigating the restorative potential of women’s home environments</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8479" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Aksel, Elif</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>İmamoğlu, Çağrı</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8479</id>
<updated>2024-06-05T11:00:21Z</updated>
<published>2023-12-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Investigating the restorative potential of women’s home environments
Aksel, Elif; İmamoğlu, Çağrı
Although research on restorative environments suggest that natural settings have therapeutic effects in moderating stress and promoting positive experiences, there is a limited body of literature inquiring about the therapeutic potential of interior environments. The aim of the current study was to understand the restorative potential of home environments regarding theoretical background on restorative environments and architectural dimensions influencing well-being through the experiences of women. We interviewed 11 adult women using the photo-elicitation technique to investigate the perceived restorativeness of their home environments. Thematic analysis of qualitative data indicated that the design attributes of spaces play a significant role in promoting the restoration process. In addition to design attributes, we found family interaction, socialising, and engaging in activities could also be influential. Furthermore, the exploratory nature of the research highlighted the significance of individual meanings and personal factors in shaping the perceived restorativeness of home environments. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed to encourage future research in related fields that explore the relationship between residential settings and well-being.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Indoor Soundscapes of the Future: Listening to Smart Houses</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8477" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Alkan, Abdul Lah</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Yörükoğlu, Papatya Nur Dökmeci</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kitapçı, Kıvanç</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8477</id>
<updated>2024-06-05T11:00:12Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Indoor Soundscapes of the Future: Listening to Smart Houses
Alkan, Abdul Lah; Yörükoğlu, Papatya Nur Dökmeci; Kitapçı, Kıvanç
The acoustic environment of smart houses impacts the overall quality of life and wellbeing of occupants. A well-designed acoustic environment can promote relaxation, while excessive noise or distractions can negatively impact wellbeing. It is crucial to consider sound’s role in smart house design. Smart houses have built-in virtual assistants that respond to voice commands, perform various tasks, and verbally respond to such commands. This machine-to-human-to-machine verbal interaction requires high speech intelligibility (i.e., low reverberation time and high signal-to-noise ratio) in smart houses, which is not required for traditional homes. The open floor plan and multi-purpose rooms in smart houses can create challenges for sound management. This can be addressed by creating separate zones for different activities or using room dividers that help to direct and absorb sound. The design of smart houses includes the placement of speakers and other audio devices to optimize sound quality and distribution. Speakers are installed in the ceiling or walls to create a more immersive and balanced listening experience. The placement of microphones and other sensors should also be optimized for smart houses. Microphones should be placed where sound is most likely heard or where it best captures voice commands. Integrating multiple audio sources and devices creates challenges in managing and organizing sound in a smart house. Designers should consider configuring smart devices and ensuring that different devices are compatible and functioning properly.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>IMPACT OF COMPLEXITY ON PERCEIVED AFFECTIVE QUALITY AND PERCEIVED RESTORATIVENESS IN INDOOR SOUNDSCAPES</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8473" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Acun, Volkan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Aksel, Elif</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8473</id>
<updated>2024-06-05T10:59:52Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">IMPACT OF COMPLEXITY ON PERCEIVED AFFECTIVE QUALITY AND PERCEIVED RESTORATIVENESS IN INDOOR SOUNDSCAPES
Acun, Volkan; Aksel, Elif
Eventfulness and pleasantness are two prominent components of soundscape perception, and their interplay creates attributes that are used to measure the perceived affective quality of soundscapes. Even though restorativeness is not among the principal components of soundscape perception, it is involved with soundscapes' perceived affective quality attributes. While the contribution of these attributes is well established, there is still a lack of understanding regarding how soundscape complexity impacts perceived restorativeness and perceived affective quality. There are tools, such as the Acoustic Complexity Index, to measure the complexity of natural soundscapes but soundscapes of the built environment lack such an index. This study aims (1) to understand the relationship between complexity, perceived affective quality and perceived restorativeness and (2) to explore and compare the effectiveness of different means of measuring acoustical complexity. With this regard, we conducted an online questionnaire survey which consisted of twenty soundscape recordings. We asked the participants to evaluate the perceived affective quality and perceived restorativeness of each recording. We then calculated the acoustic complexity indices, Acoustic complexity, Acoustic Diversity, Acoustic Evenness, and Normalized Differences Soundscape Index. Finally, we conducted a series of statistical analyses to explore the relationships between each variable. © 2023 Acun et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>DESIGN AND COUNTER DESIGN AGAINST CONSUMPTION: 1972 “ITALY, THE NEW DOMESTIC LANDSCAPE” EXHIBITION (1)</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8444" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Boysan, Aysu</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Tunca, Gülru Mutlu</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8444</id>
<updated>2024-05-30T08:10:40Z</updated>
<published>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">DESIGN AND COUNTER DESIGN AGAINST CONSUMPTION: 1972 “ITALY, THE NEW DOMESTIC LANDSCAPE” EXHIBITION (1)
Boysan, Aysu; Tunca, Gülru Mutlu
In Western Europe, the 1960s and 1970s covered the radical criticism of some European designers against mass production and consumption. Several Italian Radical designers raised the most compelling objection at an exhibition on the other side of the ocean: “Italy: The New Domestic Landscape” (INDL), curated by Emilio Ambasz in the Museum of Modern Art, New York, in 1972. INDL marked a significant moment in contemporary design history. For the show, Ambasz selected more than a hundred “objects” produced by Italian manufacturers and displayed them in specially designed cases in the garden area. Moreover, he invited eleven Italian designers to create unique “microenvironments” by interpreting concepts assigned by a “special design program,” such as environmental psychology, locality, urbanism, micro and macro-scale housing, consumerism, and mass production. Although the “objects” displayed in the garden were of great importance - since the event was one of the first instances of Italian design’s introduction to the American public-this study concentrates on the contradicting responses of Italian designers, under headings “design and counterdesign as postulation” for understanding the design philosophy behind the appearance of “design versus non-design” dialectics of that era, which is still a recognized topic in contemporary architectural theory. This study, therefore, analyzes the eclectic and postmodern approaches of six Italian designers in the “design” category and the provocative denials of Radical designers presented under the “counterdesign” category. It aims to understand better the impact of this discursive opposition made visible by the exhibition on the anticonsumerist approaches and the search for alternative methodologies, which subsequently increased among designers.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
