DSpace@Çankaya

A comparison of iterative Fourier transform algorithms for image quality estimation

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.author Alsaka, Dina Yaqoob
dc.contributor.author Arpali, Çağlar
dc.contributor.author Arpali, Serap Altay
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-19T13:15:24Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-19T13:15:24Z
dc.date.issued 2018-10-01
dc.identifier.citation Alsaka, Dina Yaqoob; Arpali, Çağlar; Arpali, Serap A. (2018). "A comparison of iterative Fourier transform algorithms for image quality estimation", Optical Review, Vol.25, No.5, pp.625-637. tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 13406000
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/7271
dc.description.abstract A comparison was established between two iterative Fourier transform algorithms (IFTAs), such as the original Gerchberg–Saxton (GS) and the mixed-region amplitude freedom (MRAF) algorithms, for the hologram reconstruction of different target images through the full reference image quality estimation (IQE) and pixel homogeneity in the Fourier plane presented theoretically and experimentally. The comparison was applied depending upon both algorithms based on a computer-generated hologram (CGH) implemented utilizing a reflective phase-modulated liquid-crystal spatial light modulator (LC-SLM) to obtain the digital kinoform holograms of the desired intensity distributions. These digital holograms were applied to reconstruct the intensity patterns for 852 nm, which represents a laser beam source. The theoretical and experimental results of the reconstructed patterns obtained using the MRAF algorithm were found to be smoother and better than the patterns obtained using the GS algorithm. Unmodulated light beam (dc term) is removed from the reconstructed patterns attributed to digital kinoform holograms of MRAF algorithm as an alternative to the theoretical and experimental results without using any additional optic equipment at the light path. Moreover, this paper discussed the full reference objective quality estimations, such as mean square error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural content (SC), normalized absolute error (NAE), normalized cross correlation (NK), and homogeneity of pixels, through the contrast (Cont) and inverse difference moment (IDM) for numerical and experimental results. According to the two desired intensity distributions processed theoretically and experimentally, the results of MRAF algorithm were found to be in the highly accurate recovered phase, the quality of image was enhanced, and the dc term was decreased. Image quality estimation of full reference objective relay on the feedback algorithms experimental attestation has not been implemented yet. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1007/s10043-018-0456-x tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess tr_TR
dc.subject Computer-Generated Hologram (CGH) tr_TR
dc.subject Diffractive Optical Element (DOE) tr_TR
dc.subject Full Reference Objective Quality tr_TR
dc.subject Iterative Fourier Transform Algorithms tr_TR
dc.subject Kinoform tr_TR
dc.subject Optical Hologram Reconstruction tr_TR
dc.title A comparison of iterative Fourier transform algorithms for image quality estimation tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Optical Review tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID 20809 tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume 25 tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue 5 tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage 625 tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage 637 tr_TR
dc.contributor.department Çankaya Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Mekatronik Mühendisliği Bölümü tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Dosyalar Boyut Biçim Göster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster