Özet:
Architectural design can be considered as a process influenced by many stakeholders, each
of which has different decision power. Each stakeholder might have his/her own criteria and
weightings depending on his/her own perspective and role. Hence design can be seen as a
multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) process.
Considering architectural design, its evaluation and quality assessment within a context of
MCDM is not regularly performed within building processes. The aim of the paper is to
find/adapt proper methodologies of MCDM, used in other domains for assessment of design
quality, adapt them to the construction domain and test their applicability.
Current tools (for instance DQI, DEEP, AEDET, HQI, LEED, BREEAM, BQA) for quality
assessment will be reviewed and compared with several MCDM methods (ie. AHP, ANP,
PROMETHEE, SAW AND TOPSIS). Advantages and disadvantages of gathered outcomes
from comparisons for assessment and applicability within architectural design will be
discussed. Finally reflections on the outcomes will be provided.