DSpace Repository

Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sümer, H. Canan
dc.contributor.author Göncü Köse, Aslı
dc.contributor.author Toker Gültaş, Yonca
dc.contributor.author Acar, F. Pınar
dc.contributor.author Karanfil, Derya
dc.contributor.author Ok, A. Başak
dc.date.accessioned 2024-06-05T11:00:07Z
dc.date.available 2024-06-05T11:00:07Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.citation Sümer, H. Canan...et al. (2024). "Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study", Journal of Psychology. tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn 0022-3980
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8476
dc.description.abstract Using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, in three consecutive studies with employed samples, we developed measures of workplace incivility, mobbing, and abusive supervision sensitive to the nuances of a non-Western context (i.e., Türkiye). In Study 1, we first conducted 15 focus groups (N = 149), identified culture-specific and universal themes underlying the focal mistreatment types, and developed the initial scales. We then pilot-tested (N = 427) and refined the scales using exploratory factor analytic procedures. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analyses (N range = 456-524) and associations between the new scales and their widely used counterparts (N = 353) yielded evidence for the construct validity of the scales. Study 2 also involved the development of short forms of relatively long incivility and abusive supervision scales. In Study 3 (N = 482), we first examined the extent to which the three scales were operationally distinct. Second, we examined the scales’ ability to predict burnout and organizational commitment. Results supported operational distinctiveness as well as the criterion-related validity of the scales. A dominance analysis revealed that the three scales had equivalent contributions in explaining the two outcome variables, further justifying their distinctiveness. We argue that the use of present scales is not necessarily restricted to the Turkish context and may prove useful more broadly in other neo-traditional contexts. tr_TR
dc.language.iso eng tr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1080/00223980.2024.2321881 tr_TR
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess tr_TR
dc.subject Abusive Supervision tr_TR
dc.subject Measurement tr_TR
dc.subject Mobbing tr_TR
dc.subject Neo-Traditional tr_TR
dc.subject Personnel tr_TR
dc.subject Scale Development tr_TR
dc.subject Turkey tr_TR
dc.subject Well-Being tr_TR
dc.subject Workplace Incivility tr_TR
dc.title Incivility, Mobbing, and Abusive Supervision: A Tripartite Scale Development Study tr_TR
dc.type article tr_TR
dc.relation.journal Journal of Psychology tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID 166202 tr_TR
dc.contributor.department Çankaya Üniversitesi, Fen - Edebiyat Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü tr_TR


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record